Siōng-sò͘

Lohankhapedia (自由的百科全書) 欲共你講..。
跳至導覽 跳至搜尋

上訴 (Siōng-sòo) (英語 (ing-gú): appeal) (Teh)法律 (huat-lu̍t) (siōng) ()案件 (àn-kiānn) ()上級 (siōng-kip)機關 (ki-kuan)複審 (ho̍k-sím) (ê)過程 (kuè-tîng)當事 (tong-sū) (hong)要求 (iau-kiû)政式 (tsìng-sik)經改 (king-kái)關方 (kuan-hong)決定 (kuat-tīng)。上sò͘ kì是救政 (kiù-tsìng)錯誤 (tshò-ngōo)的過程, ()重稱 (tîng-tshing) (hām)解說 (kái-sueh)法律的過程.[1] 雖罔 (Sui-bóng)上訴法院 (huat-īnn)已經 (í-king)存在 (tsûn-tsāi) (sòo)青年 (tshing-nî); ()kuh英美 (ing-bí) (huat)國家 (kok-ka)一得到 (it-tit-kàu)19世紀 (sè-kí) (tsiah) ()頃定 (khíng-tīng)的上訴 (kuân)納入 (la̍p-ji̍p)怹的 (in-ê)判例 (phuànn-lē)內底 (lāi-té).[2]

註解 (Tsù-kái)[修改]

  1. See generally, Keenan D. Kmiec, The Origin & Current Meanings of "Judicial Activism", 92 Cal. L. Rev.1441, 1442 (2004) (discussing contemporary discourse regarding judicial activism); Jonathan Mallamud, Prospective Limitation and the Rights of the Accused, 56 Iowa L.Rev.321, 359 (1970) ("the power of the courts to contribute (to)the growth of the law in keeping with the demands of society"); Realist Jurisprudence & Prospective Overruling, 109 U. 巴. L. Rev.1, 6 (1960) (discussing appeals as "a deliberate and conscious technique of judicial lawmaking"). (英語)
  2. Stan Keillor, Should Minnesota Recognize A State Constitutional Right都 (A)Criminal Appeal?, 36 Hamline L. Rev.399, 402 (2013). (英語)

參閱 (Tsham-ua̍t)[修改]

外部 (Guā-pōo)連結 (liân-kiat)[修改]