Arthur Schopenhauer
跳至導覽
跳至搜尋
Arthur Schopenhauer (1788
註解 [修改]
- ↑ "Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)".
- ↑ Frederick C. Beiser reviews the commonly held position that Schopenhauer was a transcendental idealist and彼rejects it: "Though it is deeply heretical from the standpoint of transcendental idealism, Schopenhauer's objective standpoint involves a form of transcendental realism, 伊.e. the assumption of the independent reality of the world of experience." (Beiser 2016, p. 40)
- ↑ Voluntarism (philosophy) – Britannica.com
- ↑ Arthur Schopenhauer, Arthur Schopenhauer: The World as Will and Presentation, Volume 1, Routledge, 2016, p. 211: "the world[is a]merepresentation, object for a subject ..."
- ↑ Lennart Svensson, Borderline: A Traditionalist Outlook for Modern Man, Numen Books, 2015, p. 71: "[Schopenhauer ] said that 'the world is our conception'. A world without a perceiver would in that case be an impossibility. 魩we can—彼said—gain knowledge about Essential Reality for looking into ourselves, by introspection. ... This is one of many examples of the anthropic principle. The world is there for the sake of man."
- ↑ The World as Will and Representation， vol。 3， Ch。 50.
- ↑ Dale Jacquette, pian. (2007). Schopenhauer， Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge University Press. p. 162. ISBN 978-0-521-04406-6.
For Kant， the mathematical sublime， as seen for example in the starry heavens， suggests to imagination the infinite， which in turn leads by subtle turns of contemplation都the concept of God。 Schopenhauer's atheism will have none of this， and彼rightly observes that despite adopting Kant's distinction between the dynamical and mathematical sublime， his theory of the sublime， making reference都the struggles and sufferings of struggles and sufferings of Will， is unlike Kant's.
- ↑ Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation. 1， Book 4.
For the philosopher， these accounts of the lives of holy， self-denying men， badly as they are generally written， and mixed as they are with superstition and nonsense， are， because of the significance of the material， immeasurably more instructive and important than even Plutarch and Livy。 ..。魩the spirit of this development of Christianity is certainly nowhere so fully and powerfully expressed as in the writings of the German mystics，怹the works of Meister Eckhard， and in that justly famous bo͘k Die Deutsche Theologie.
- ↑ Howard, Don A. (December 2005), "Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science" (PDF), Physics Today, 58 (12): 34–40, Bibcode:2005PhT....58l..34H, doi:10.1063/1.2169442, goân-loē-iông (PDF) tī 2022-10-09 hőng khó͘-pih, 8 March 2015 khòaⁿ--ê – via University of Notre Dame， Notre Dame， IN， author's personal webpage,
From Schopenhauer彼had learned to regard the independence of spatially separated systems as， virtually， a necessary a priori assumption ..。 Einstein regarded his separation principle， descended from Schopenhauer's principium individuationis， as virtually an axiom for any future fundamental physics。 ..。 Schopenhauer stressed the essential structuring role of space and time in individuating physical systems and their evolving states。 This view implies that difference of location suffices to make two systems different in the sense that each has its own real physical state， independent of the state of the other。 For Schopenhauer， the mutual independence of spatially separated systems was a necessary a priori truth.
- ↑ Frederick C. Beiser, "After Hegel: German Philosophy, 1840–1900." Princeton University Press. 2014. p. 49: "Dilthey's conception of a worldview, as
彼 finally formulated it in Das Wesen der Philosophie， shows a large debt to Schopenhauer。 Like his great forebear， Dilthey believed that philosophy had first and foremost an ethical function， that its main purpose was to address 'the puzzle of the world'." - ↑ "John Gray: Forget everything you know – Profiles, People". The Independent. London. 3 September 2002. goân-loē-iông tī 9 April 2010 hőng khó͘-pih. 12 March 2010 khòaⁿ--ê.
- ↑ Allan Janik and Stephen Toulmin (1973). Wittgenstein's Vienna. New York: Simon and Schuster. p. 74.
Kraus himself was no philosopher, even less a scientist. If Kraus's views have a philosophical ancestry, this comes most assuredly from Schopenhauer; for alone among the great philosophers, Schopenhauer was a kindred spirit, a man of philosophical profundity, with a strange talent for polemic and aphorism, a literary as weIl as philosophical genius. Schopenhauer, indeed, was the only philosopher who at all appealed to Kraus.
- ↑ Kerr, R. B. (1932). "Anthony M. Ludovici The prophet of anti-feminism". www.anthonymludovici.com. 5 May 2019 khòaⁿ--ê.
- ↑ Bassani, Giuseppe-Franco (15 December 2006). Società Italiana di Fisica, pian. Ettore Majorana: Scientific Papers. Springer. p. xl. ISBN 978-3-540-48091-4.
His interest in philosophy， which had always been great， increased and prompted欣都reflect deeply on the works of various philosophers，怹particular Schopenhauer.
- ↑ Magee, Bryan (1997). Confessions of a Philosopher., Ch. 16
- ↑ B.F. McGuinness. Moritz Schlick. pp. 336–37.
Once again, one has to understand Schlick's world conception, which彼to͘k over from Schopenhauer's world as representation and as will. … “To will something”—and here Schlick is heavily influenced by Schopenhauer
- ↑ Maertz, Gregory (1994). "Elective Affinities: Tolstoy and Schopenhauer". Wiener Slavistisches Jahrbuch. Harrassowitz Verlag. 40: 53–62. ISSN 0084-0041. JSTOR 24748326.
外部 連結 [修改]
- Schopenhauer tī Project Gutenberg ê chok-phín
- Arthur Schopenhauer tī Internet Archive ê chok-phín
- Works by Arthur Schopenhauer at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
- Wicks, Robert (Spring 2019). "Arthur Schopenhauer". Chū Zalta, Edward N。. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
- Arthur Schopenhaueran article by Mary Troxell inInternet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2011
- Schopenhauersource: Reproductions of Schopenhauer's manuscripts
- Kant's philosophy as rectified by Schopenhauer
- Timeline of German Philosophers
- AQuick IntroductiontoSchopenhauer
- Ross， Kelley L.， 1998， "Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860)。" Two short essays， on Schopenhauer's life and work， and on his dim view of academia。
 | Pún 文章 sī chi̍t phiⁿ phí-á-kiáⁿ. Lí thang tàu khok-chhiong lâi pang-chō͘ Wikipedia. |
